4.4 Article

Chronic low back pain: Patients' experiences, opinions and expectations for clinical management

Journal

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
Volume 29, Issue 24, Pages 1899-1909

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638280701189895

Keywords

chronic low back pain; patient expectations; advice; exercise; adherence

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To explore the experiences, opinions and treatment expectations of chronic low back pain (LBP) patients in order to identify what components of treatment they consider as being of most value. Method. Three stand-alone focus groups were convened. All participants were experiencing chronic non-specific LBP ( 43 months). Each group was facilitated by an independent moderator, and guided by a series of pre-determined questions. Participants were encouraged to freely air their personal opinions during the discussion. Transcribed data were organized into a series of 'categories' using the Qualitative Solutions for Researchers Nudist 6 package from which five common themes emerged. Results. Each participant had typically experienced a variety of failed treatment approaches. Whilst the value of advice and exercise was recognized, participants typically questioned the appropriateness of such treatment given the fact that a precise diagnosis was rarely given, and symptoms often recurred. As a result, poor adherence with advice and exercise appeared to be a key factor limiting the potential effectiveness of long-term self-management strategies. Conclusions. Participants considered appropriate exercise ( despite pain) and activity modification as important components for effective long-term self-management of symptoms. To enhance treatment effectiveness, participants welcomed the introduction of individually tailored advice and exercise programmes, with supervision and follow-up support, along with a better understanding of the physical and emotional impact of chronic LBP by practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available