4.2 Article

Habitat selection by black bears in an intensively logged boreal forest

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 11, Pages 1307-1316

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/Z08-118

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ministere des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Quebec, the Universite du Quebec a Rimouski, the Fonds quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies
  2. Endangered Species Recovery Fund
  3. Fondation de la faune du Quebec

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extensive logging of the boreal forest rejuvenates landscapes once dominated by old-growth stands. As black bear (Ursus americanus Pallas, 1780) fitness and behavior are known to be primarily related to the abundance of shade-intolerant soft mast species in northern forests, we hypothesized that logging will influence habitat and space use patterns of black bears. We used VHF telemetry on 12 female black bears in the Reserve faunique des Laurentides (Quebec, Canada) to investigate seasonal patterns of habitat selection in an exploited heterogeneous boreal landscape at different spatial scales. Habitat characterization based on seven forest cover types allowed us to compare the productivity of key forage species in various post-logging age classes. Regenerating stands (6-20 years old) had the uppermost ground vegetation cover, providing both the highest density and a high biomass of berries. Black bears preferred regenerating stands (6-20 years old) and avoided mature coniferous forests inside their home range. Home-range size was inversely related to the proportion of regenerating stands (6-20 years old). Intensive logging influenced black bear habitat and space use patterns, and presumably their population dynamics. An increase in the habitat quality of an opportunistic predator poses great concern for conservation, especially for forest-dwelling woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou (Gmelin, 1788)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available