4.5 Review

The role of the activated macrophage in clearing Listeria monocytogenes infection

Journal

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages 2683-2692

Publisher

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/2364

Keywords

listeriolysin O; ROI; RNI; NOS2; phagosome maturation; cholesterol-dependent cytolysin; interferon-gamma; Rab5; lysosome; review

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI035950] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI035950-14, R01 AI035950, R0I AI 35950] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macrophage activation often contributes to the strong immune response elicited upon infection. The ability of macrophages to become activated was discovered when sub-lethal primary infections of mice with the bacterium Listeria monocytogenes provided protection against secondary infections through non-humoral immunity. L. monocytogenes infect and propagate in macrophages by escaping the phagosome into the cytosol, where they avoid humoral immune mediators. Activated macrophages kill L. monocytogenes by blocking phagosomal escape. The timing of the antimicrobial activities within the phagosome is crucial to the outcome. In non-activated macrophages, bacterial factors generally prevail, and L. monocytogenes can escape from the vacuoles and grow within cytoplasm. Activated macrophages generate reactive oxygen or nitrogen intermediates early after bacterial uptake, which prevent the bacteria from escaping vacuoles into cytoplasm. The heterogeneity in the interactions between L. monocytogenes and the macrophage indicate a complex relationship between the host and the pathogen governed by chemistries that promote and inhibit escape from vacuoles. This review examines the mechanisms used by activated and non-activated macrophages to kill microbes, and how those mechanisms are employed against L. monocytogenes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available