4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Manufacturing knowledge sharing in PLM: a progression towards the use of heavy weight ontologies

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 7, Pages 1505-1519

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207540600942268

Keywords

product lifecycle management; decision support; manufacturing knowledge sharing; ontologies

Funding

  1. Economic and Social Research Council [RES-331-27-0006] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C534220/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. ESRC [RES-331-27-0006] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The drive to maximize the potential benefits of decision support systems continues to increase as industry is continually driven by the competitive needs of operating in dynamic global environments. The more extensive information support tools which are becoming available in the PLM world appear to have great potential but require a substantial overhead in their configuration. However, sharing information and knowledge in cross-disciplinary teams and across system and company boundaries is not straightforward and there is a clear need for more effective frameworks for information and knowledge sharing if new product development processes are to have effective ICT support. This paper presents a view of the current status of manufacturing information sharing using light-weight ontologies and goes on to discuss the potential for heavyweight ontological engineering approaches such as the Process Specification Language (PSL). It explains why such languages are needed and how they provide an important step towards process knowledge sharing. Machining examples are used to illustrate how PSL provides a rigorous basis for process knowledge sharing and subsequently to illustrate the value of linking foundation and domain ontologies to provide a basis for multi-context knowledge sharing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available