4.5 Article

Exploring the dynamics of aphasic word production using the picture-word interference task: A case study

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 939-953

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.026

Keywords

aphasia; spoken word production; picture-word interference task; anomia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we use an auditory picture-word interference task to examine an anomic individual, NP. NP produced semantic errors in picture naming, but his comprehension was relatively well preserved. In the task, pictures to be named were accompanied by semantically, phonologically or unrelated distractors, presented at lonsets ranging from - 200 ms (before target) to +400 ms (after target). Naming latencies were measured. A group of 12 older controls showed semantic interference (slower latencies with semantic than with unrelated distractors), which was significant at -200 ms, and steadily diminished across later onsets. In contrast, at 0 ms, NP showed powerful semantic facilitation. There were no significant semantic effects at other onsets, but the trends, particularly at later onsets, were towards interference. Phonological effects for NP were in the same direction as for controls (facilitation) but were of greater magnitude. Indeed, NP showed a reliable facilitatory effect at 0 ms (and trends at -200 ms and +200 ms), but a similar trend in controls failed to reach significance. Within recent models of this task, in which semantic facilitation effects are attributed to an early, pre-lexical semantic processing stage, NP's pattern indicates that semantic processing is abnormally prolonged. The phonological facilitation effects are also consistent with this interpretation. We discuss their implications and future applications of the task to aphasia. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available