4.2 Article

Nitrogen availability from peat amendments used in boreal oil sands reclamation

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 165-175

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.4141/CJSS09021

Keywords

Soil nitrogen; soil reclamation; nitrification; mineralization; boreal soils

Categories

Funding

  1. NSERC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hemstock, S. S., Quideau, S. A. and Chanasyk, D. S. 2010. Nitrogen availability from peat amendments used in boreal oil sands reclamation. Can. J. Soil Sci. 90: 165-175. Following surface mining, peat is typically used as an organic amendment to cap reconstructed soils in the Athabasca oil sands region of Alberta. Yet, very little is known about its ability to provide available nitrogen (N) in these soils. Hence, the overall objective of this study was to measure soil nitrogen (N) availability throughout the year in five peat amendments. Specific objectives were: (1) to examine seasonal variability in soil labile N pool sizes (nitrate, ammonium, dissolved organic N, and microbial biomass N), and (2) to determine in situ net nitrification, ammonification, and mineralization rates using the resin-core technique. Results from this field incubation method indicated a strong seasonal variability in net mineralization rates, with maximum positive values in the fall, and low or negative rates in winter. Net ammonification rates, which were significantly correlated to soil moisture content, were significantly smaller and showed smaller seasonal fluctuations and fewer differences among peat materials than net nitrification rates. Furthermore, the contribution of net nitrification to total net mineralization rates was characteristically higher than what is typically observed in undisturbed boreal forest soils. Taken together, results indicate that net nitrification processes may control nitrogen availability in these reclaimed soils.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available