4.5 Article

Tumour budding at invasive margins and outcome in colorectal cancer

Journal

COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 41-47

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01240.x

Keywords

tumour budding; colorectal cancer; outcome; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Tumour budding, defined as small clusters of undifferentiated cancer cells at invasive margins, has been shown to reflect biologic aggressiveness of colorectal cancers. We therefore examined the prognostic significance of tumour budding in patients with colorectal carcinoma, particularly focusing on comparisons with other clinicopathological findings. Method Tumour budding was investigated in surgically resected specimens from 159 patients with colorectal carcinoma. With haematoxylin and eosin stained slides containing the entire invasive margin, the degree of tumour budding was classified into three grades: mild, < 1/3 of the entire invasive margin; moderate, 1/3-2/3; marked, > 2/3. Results Mild tumour budding was found in 54 (34%) cases, moderate in 59 (37%) cases and marked in 46 (29%) cases. The degree of budding was linked with poor tumour differentiation, lymph node metastasis and advanced TNM stage (P < 0.001). In univariate analysis, patients with marked tumour budding [5-year cancer-related survival (CRS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS), 39%/53%] had significantly worse survival [CRS, hazard ratio (HR), 4.561; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.265-9.184; P < 0.001; RFS, HR, 3.240; 95% CI, 1.430-7.342; P = 0.005] than those with mild (5-year CRS/RFS, 80%/82%) or moderate (63%/66%) budding. In the Cox regression model, marked tumour budding (HR, 3.137; 95% CI, 1.517-6.487; P = 0.002) and advanced tumour stage (stage III, HR, 3.226; 95% CI, 1.475-7.053; P = 0.003; stage IV, HR, 24.443; 95% CI, 10.843-55.100; P < 0.001) proved to be an independent predictor of short CRS. Conclusion Tumour budding is a practical and significant histological index for identification of high malignant potential and poor outcome in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available