4.2 Article

Genotype, task specialization, and nest environment influence the stinging response thresholds of individual africanized and european honeybees to electrical stimulation

Journal

BEHAVIOR GENETICS
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 93-100

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10519-007-9177-9

Keywords

Apis mellifera; defensive behavior; guards; Africanized honeybees; response thresholds; electric stimuli

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to analyze the stinging response thresholds of individual European and Africanized worker honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) to electrical stimulation. Newly emerged workers were identified, and either were placed into an incubator, into their natal colonies, or cross-fostered in common colonies of European or Africanized ancestry. Nest and guard bees of each type were collected and exposed to an electric stimulus of 0.5 mA, and the time they took to sting a leather substrate was recorded. Africanized bees consistently had significant lower thresholds of defensive response than European bees across all of the environments tested. Guards were faster to sting than nest bees only for the Africanized genotype, suggesting that alleles of African origin have pleiotropic effects on guarding and stinging. This is the first study that shows that single individuals specialized in guarding also may have a lower response threshold for stinging. Environmental effects were also evident. In all cases, bees responded faster to the electrical stimulation after being kept in environments other than their natal nest. Moreover, significant genotype by environment and genotype by task specialization interactions were found. Our results fit a model of division of labor based on differences in response thresholds to stimuli among workers of different genotypes and task groups that result in non-additive effects on colony behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available