4.5 Article

Robust covariate-adjusted log-rank statistics and corresponding sample size formula for recurrent events data

Journal

BIOMETRICS
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages 741-750

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00948.x

Keywords

local alternative; log-rank statistic; power; proportional means; recurrent events data; sample size

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA075142, CA075142, R29 CA075142, R01 CA075142-11, R01 CA075142-10, R01 CA075142-09A1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL057444, HL57444, R29 HL057444, R01 HL057444-11] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA075142, R29CA075142] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL057444, R29HL057444] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recurrent events data are frequently encountered in clinical trials. This article develops robust covariate-adjusted log-rank statistics applied to recurrent events data with arbitrary numbers of events under independent censoring and the corresponding sample size formula. The proposed log-rank tests are robust with respect to different data-generating processes and are adjusted for predictive covariates. It reduces to the Kong and Slud (1997, Biometrika 84, 847-862) setting in the case of a single event. The sample size formula is derived based on the asymptotic normality of the covariate-adjusted log-rank statistics under certain local alternatives and a working model for baseline covariates in the recurrent event data context. When the effect size is small and the baseline covariates do not contain significant information about event times, it reduces to the same form as that of Schoenfeld (1983, Biometrics (3)9, 499-503) for cases of a single event or independent event times within a subject. We carry out simulations to study the control of type I error and the comparison of powers between several methods in finite samples. The proposed sample size formula is illustrated using data from an rhDNase study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available