4.3 Article

Comparative cardiovascular safety of insulin secretagogues following hospitalization for ischemic heart disease among type 2 diabetes patients: a cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIABETES AND ITS COMPLICATIONS
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 196-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.11.012

Keywords

lschemic heart disease; Insulin secretagogue; Retrospective cohort study; Type 2 diabetes; Atrial fibrillation

Funding

  1. Canadian Diabetes Association [OG-2-09-2693-SS]
  2. Blanch/Wirtanen/Alberta Diabetes Foundation/Alberta Diabetes Institute Studentship for Diabetes Research
  3. Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes (ACHORD) Studentship - Canadian Institutes for Health Research [OGT-88588]
  4. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions
  5. Alberta Diabetes Institute
  6. Alliance for Canadian Health Outcomes Research in Diabetes (ACHORD) Strategic Training Program in Diabetic Research
  7. Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Scholarship
  8. Canadian Diabetes Association Doctoral Studentship
  9. Alberta Innovates [201201154] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To evaluate the association between insulin secretagogues and adverse cardiovascular sequelae in type 2 diabetes patients hospitalized for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: Administrative health records from Alberta, Canada between 1998 and 2010 were used to identify 2,254 gliclazide, 3,289 glyburide and 740 repaglinide users prior to an IHD-related hospitalization. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to compare the 30-day risk of a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or new onset of atrial fibrillation, stroke, heart failure or myocardial infarction according to insulin secretagogue use. Results: Mean (SD) age was 76.1 (6.9) years, and 60.7% were men. The composite outcome occurred in 322 (30.2%) gliclazide users, 455 (28.1%) glyburide users and 81(23.4%) repaglinide users within 30 days of IHD hospitalization. There were no differences in risk for glyburide use (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.05) or repaglinide use (aHR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63-1.03) compared to gliclazide. Similar results were observed in analyses for each element of the composite outcome. Conclusions: In older patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for IHD, prior use of gliclazide, glyburide, or repaglinide appears to be associated with a similar risk of adverse cardiovascular sequelae. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available