4.4 Article

A multi-session interpretation modification program: Changes in interpretation and social anxiety symptoms

Journal

BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 1135-1141

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.05.012

Keywords

Social anxiety; Interpretation; Information processing; Treatment; Training

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R34 MH073004, R34 MH077129, R01 MH087623] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH087623, R34MH077129, R34MH073004] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research suggests that socially anxious individuals interpret ambiguous social information in a more threatening manner compared to non-anxious individuals. Recently, studies have experimentally modified interpretation and shown that this subsequently affected anxiety in non-anxious individuals. If similar procedures can modify interpretation biases in socially anxious individuals, they may lead to a reduction in social anxiety symptoms. In the current study, we examined the effect of a computerized Interpretation Modification Program (IMP) on interpretation bias and social anxiety symptoms. Twenty-seven socially anxious individuals were randomly assigned to the IMP or a control condition. Participants completed eight computer sessions over four weeks. The IMP modified interpretation by providing positive feedback when participants made benign interpretations and negative feedback in response to threat interpretations. The IMP successfully decreased threat interpretations, increased benign interpretations, and decreased social anxiety symptoms compared to the control condition. Moreover, changes in benign interpretation mediated IMP's effect on social anxiety. This initial trial suggests that interpretation modification may have clinical utility when applied as a multi-session intervention. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available