4.3 Review

Engineering root microbiomes for healthier crops and soils using beneficial, environmentally safe bacteria

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 91-104

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2018-0315

Keywords

biofertilizer; biosafety; PGPR/PGPB; biopesticide; phytomicrobiome

Funding

  1. Fundacion Ramon Areces (Spain)
  2. Universidad de Salamanca
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. UCLA Faculty Award
  5. Shanbrom Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Green Revolution developed new crop varieties, which greatly improved food security worldwide. However, the growth of these plants relied heavily on chemical fertilizers and pesticides, which have led to an overuse of synthetic fertilizers, insecticides, and herbicides with serious environmental consequences and negative effects on human health. Environmentally friendly plant-growth-promoting methods to replace our current reliance on synthetic chemicals and to develop more sustainable agricultural practices to offset the damage caused by many agrochemicals are proposed herein. The increased use of bioinoculants, which consist of microorganisms that establish synergies with target crops and influence production and yield by enhancing plant growth, controlling disease, and providing critical mineral nutrients, is a potential solution. The microorganisms found in bioinoculants are often bacteria or fungi that reside within either external or internal plant micro-biomes. However, before they can be used routinely in agriculture, these microbes must be confirmed as nonpathogenic strains that promote plant growth and survival. In this article, besides describing approaches for discovering plant-growth-promoting bacteria in various environments, including phytomicrobiomes and soils, we also discuss methods to evaluate their safety for the environment and for human health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available