4.3 Article

Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil from the Pampa Ondulada, Argentina, assessed by pyrosequencing and morphological techniques

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 60, Issue 12, Pages 819-827

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjm-2014-0364

Keywords

glomeromycota; agroecosystem; biodiversity; pyrosequencing technology; morphotyping taxonomy

Funding

  1. Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANCYPT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of agronomic practices on the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal community in soils from the Pampa Ondulada region (Argentina), and to compare conclusions reached when using pyrosequencing or a morphological approach. The AM fungal diversity of 3 agricultural exploitations located in the Pampa Ondulada region (Argentina) was assessed by using 454 amplicon pyrosequencing and morphological (based on spore traits) approaches. Two kinds of soil managements are found in these sites: agronomic and non-agronomic. A total of 188 molecular operational taxonomic units and 29 morphological species of AM fungi were identified. No effect of soil management on AM richness was detected. AM fungal communities were more diverse and equitable in the absence of agronomic management. In contrast, the results on beta-diversity varied according to the methodology used. We concluded that agronomic management of soil has a negative effect on AM fungal community biodiversity in the Pampa Ondulada region. We also conclude that both methodologies complement each other in the study of AM fungal ecology. This study greatly improved the knowledge about AM fungi in South America where the molecular diversity of AM fungi was practically unknown.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available