4.3 Article

Bacterial endophytes mediate positive feedback effects of early legume termination times on the yield of subsequent durum wheat crops

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages 1368-1377

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/w2012-114

Keywords

durum wheat; Triticum turgidum var. durum; Cicer arietinum; pulse-wheat rotation; endophytic bacteria; pyrosequencing; termination time; rotation effect; root endosphere

Funding

  1. Novozymes
  2. Saskatchewan Pulse Growers
  3. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Matching Investment Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Field crops influence the biotic properties of the soil, impacting the health and productivity of subsequent crops. Polymerase chain reaction and 454 GS FLX pyrosequencing of amplicons were used to clarify the legacy of chickpea and pea crops on the quality of the bacterial community colonizing the root endosphere of subsequent crops of wheat, in a replicated field study. Similar communities of root endosphere bacteria were formed in durum wheat grown after pea and chickpea crops when chickpea crops were terminated as early as pea (July). Termination of the chickpea crops in September led to the domination of Firmicutes in wheat root endosphere; Actinobacteria dominated the wheat root endosphere following early pulse crop termination. The architecture of wheat plants was correlated with the composition of its root endosphere community. High grain yield was associated with the production of fewer but larger wheat heads, the abundance of endospheric Actinobacteria and Acidobacteria, and the scarcity of endospheric Firmicutes. Pulse termination time affected wheat root endosphere colonization strongly in 2009 but weakly in 2010, an abnormally wet year. This study improved our understanding of the so-called crop rotation effect in pulse-wheat systems and showed how this system can be manipulated through agronomic decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available