4.3 Article

Optimal recall period and response task for self-reported HIV medication adherence

Journal

AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 86-94

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-007-9261-4

Keywords

patient compliance; HIV infection; HIV infection; drug therapy; questionnaires

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000054, K24RR020300] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [P30AI042853] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R01DA015679] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Self-reported measures of antiretroviral adherence vary greatly in recall time periods and response tasks. To determine which time frame is most accurate, we compared 3-, 7-day, and 1-month self-reports with data from medication event monitoring system (MEMS). To determine which response task is most accurate we compared three different 1-month self-report tasks (frequency, percent, and rating) to MEMS. We analyzed 643 study visits made by 156 participants. Over-reporting (self-report minus MEMS) was significantly less for the 1-month recall period (9%) than for the 3 (17%) or 7-day (14%) periods. Over-reporting was significantly less for the 1-month rating task (3%) than for the 1-month frequency and percent tasks (both 12%). We conclude that 1-month recall periods may be more accurate than 3- or 7-day periods, and that items that ask respondents to rate their adherence may be more accurate than those that ask about frequencies or percents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available