Herbivory and novel weapons: no evidence for enhanced competitive ability or allelopathy induction of Centaurea diffusa by biological controls

Biological control of weeds by arthropod herbivores is thought to work by reducing the competitive ability of the weed relative to the surrounding vegetation. However, the assumption that herbivory reduces plant competitive ability has not been tested in most biological control systems, and counter to expectation, recent research on the impact of biological control agents on invasive Centaurea species suggests that this genus may respond to herbivory by increased competitive ability through enhanced plant re-growth and/or by inducing increased production of phytotoxic allelochemicals. We examined the impact of two biological control agents of the invasive plant diffuse knapweed (C. diffusa) to see if feeding by either of these insects would enhance the plant's competitive ability or allelochemical output. Sub-lethal herbivory by either of the biological control agents significantly reduced knapweed performance when the plant was grown in competition with either of two native species. Competition with knapweed significantly reduced the performance of both native species (Artemisia frigida and Bouteloua gracilis), and herbivory by one of the biocontrol agents resulted in a small but significant increase in both native species' performance. Diffuse knapweed's putative allelochemical 8-hydroxyquinoline was not detected in experimental or field collected soils from knapweed-infested sites. In contrast to other studies on the impacts of biological control on other Centaurea species, these data support the premise that biological control agents may reduce invading plant competitive ability. We find no evidence for diffuse knapweed allelopathy mediated by 8-hydroxyquinoline or enhanced allelopathy in response to herbivory by biological control agents.