4.4 Article

Scale and strength of oak-mesophyte interactions in a transitional oak-hickory forest

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 1366-1372

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0131

Keywords

oak replacement; succession; pair correlation function; red maple; mesophication

Categories

Funding

  1. Edwin S. George Reserve Fund
  2. USDA McIntyre-Stennis Grant
  3. Middlebury College Millennium Fund
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM103449] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forests in eastern North America are undergoing rapid compositional changes as they experience novel climate, disturbance, and pest conditions. One striking pattern is the replacement of canopy oaks (Quercus spp.) by mesic, fire-sensitive, shade-tolerant species like red maple (Acer rubrum L.). To gain insight into the successional patterns driving stand-level canopy oak replacement, we ask two questions: (i) What is the spatial association of oak and mesophyte recruitment compared with oak and mesophyte overstory individuals, and (ii) How do oaks and mesophytes differentially respond to canopy openings. We analyzed census data from a 23 ha forest plot surveyed in 2003, 2008, and 2014. We show that oak recruits are negatively associated with overstory red maples and black cherries (Prunus serotina Ehrh.), whereas mesophytic recruits were positively associated with overstory oaks. Second, we found that proximity to a dead overstory tree increased growth and survival for black cherries, increased growth for red maples, but had no effect on oaks. Black cherries and red maples are therefore better suited than oaks to take advantage of canopy openings and the moderate light available under adult oaks. These same fine scale competitive processes are contributing to canopy oak replacement across eastern North America.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available