4.4 Article

Drought-driven disturbance history characterizes a southern Rocky Mountain subalpine forest

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 1649-1660

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X2012-102

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ecology Center
  2. T.W. Daniel Endowment
  3. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University, Logan, Utah
  4. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station [8171]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The view that subalpine forest vegetation dynamics in western North America are driven by a particular disturbance type (i.e., fire) has shaped our understanding of their disturbance regimes. In the wake of a recent (1990s) landscape-extent spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) outbreak in the southern Rocky Mountains, we re-examined the temporal continuity in disturbance types and interactions and the possible role of drought on their occurrence by reconstructing antecedent disturbances for 11 sites across the Markagunt Plateau, southern Utah, USA. Multiple consistent lines of evidence suggested that historic fires were the primary antecedent disturbance, while relatively minor, stand-specific spruce beetle activity occurred later in stand development but prior to the recent outbreak. Unlike the recent outbreak, antecedent fires were spatially and temporally asynchronous over the period examined (similar to 1600-2000). Reconstructed fire events primarily occurred during periods of prolonged drought. Similarly, historic spruce beetle activity, indicated by species-specific tree-ring release, and timing of Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii Parry ex Engelm.) death dates from the recent outbreak were related to drought conditions. Vegetation dynamics on this landscape were strongly driven by historic fires and the recent spruce beetle outbreak, and drought conditions likely influenced the occurrence of both disturbance types.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available