4.4 Article

Dendroclimatic response of a coastal alpine treeline ecotone: a multispecies perspective from Labrador

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 469-478

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X10-192

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. International Polar Year PPS Arctic project
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Memorial University of Newfoundland
  4. Environment Canada's Northern Ecosystems Initiative
  5. Northern Scientific Training Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coastal alpine forests are highly vulnerable to oceanic climate trends, yet these diverse environmental interactions remain poorly understood. We used a multispecies perspective to try to better assess the radial growth response of alpine treeline species within the Northeast Atlantic region of North America to climate variables using bootstrapped correlation analysis. The four species present, black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B. S. P.), white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss), balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), and eastern larch (Larix laricina (Du Roi) K. Koch) were sampled in an effort to capture tree-climate sensitivity that is representative of this entire alpine treeline. The climate-growth relationships of spruce trees were comparable with those reported in other Labrador studies, but spring drought sensitivity as reported for coastal northern white spruce trees was not observed. Rather, high levels of precipitation suggest that drought did not limit the radial growth of any of the four species. The relatively small number of statistically significant correlations between monthly climate variables and fir and larch trees suggests that factors other than climate limit their radial growth. The multispecies approach better highlighted the range of species-specific relationships between alpine treeline forests and maritime climates (monthly temperature and precipitation) found at the treeline ecotone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available