4.4 Article

The effects of timber harvest, forest fire, and herbivores on regeneration of deciduous trees in boreal pine-dominated forests

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages 712-722

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X08-208

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Finnish Centre of Excellence Programme 2000-2005 [64308]
  3. Finnish Society of Forest Science (Suomen Metsatieteellinen Seura)
  4. Emil Aaltonen Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Forest management fire and herbivores are the major factors affecting regeneration of deciduous trees in boreal forests. In a large-scale experiment we manipulated the use of prescribed burning the level of green-tree retention and the presence of moose (Alces alces L.) and hare (Lepus timidus L. and Lepus europaeus Pallas) to study their effects on early regeneration of three native pioneer tree species i.e. rowan (Sorbus aucuparia L.) aspen (Populus tremula L.) and silver birch (Betula pendula Roth). Green-tree retention enhanced survival of all tested tree species. Prescribed burning enhanced the survival rate of birch and rowan but aspen survival was only enhanced by burning on clearcuts and areas with 50 m(3)/ha of retention trees. Excluding moose enhanced rowan growth and birch survival. Aspen growth and survival was enhanced when both moose and hare were excluded. Seedlings were most frequently browsed on clearcuts and most seedling mortality was caused by voles or hare. At low densities the effect of moose on pioneer trees may be smaller than that of other herbivores or the fire-management regime. Considering the large number of species depending on pioneer trees the results support the use of tree retention and fire as useful management alternatives not only to promote biodiversity but also to enhance regeneration of deciduous trees and reduce herbivore damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available