4.3 Article

Maintaining Large Weight Losses: The Role of Behavioral and Psychological Factors

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 1015-1021

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0014159

Keywords

behavioral predictors; psychological predictors; weight regain prevention; weight loss maintenance

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK057413-05, R01 DK057413-04, R01 DK057413-01A1, DK 057413, R01 DK057413-03, R01 DK057413-02, R01 DK057413] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK057413] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few studies have examined predictors of weight regain after significant weight losses. This prospective study examined behavioral and psychological predictors of weight regain in 261 successful weight losers who completed an 18-month trial of weight regain prevention that compared a control condition with self-regulation interventions delivered face-to-face or via the Internet. Linear mixed effect models were used to examine behavioral and psychological predictors of weight regain, both as main effects and as interactions with treatment group. Decreases in physical activity were related to weight regain across all 3 groups. and increased frequency of self-weighing was equally protective in the 2 intervention groups but not in the control group. Increases in depressive symptoms. disinhibition, and hunger were also related to weight regain in all groups. Although the impact of changes in restraint. was greatest in the Internet group and weakest in the face-to-face group, the latter was the only group with increases in restraint over time and consequent decreases in magnitude of weight regain. Future programs should focus on maintaining physical activity. dietary restraints, and frequent self-weighing and should include stronger components to modify psychological parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available