4.4 Article

Modeling oxythermal stress for cool-water fishes in lakes using a cumulative dosage approach

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES
Volume 75, Issue 8, Pages 1303-1312

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0260

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF-LTER program [DEB-1440297]
  2. University of Wisconsin Water Resources Institute USGS 10(B) Research grant
  3. University of Wisconsin Office of Sustainability SIRE Award Program
  4. Department of Interior Northeast Climate Science Center
  5. United States Geological Survey [G12AC00001]
  6. Division Of Environmental Biology
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1440297] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lake warming can negatively impact cool-water fishes through both temperature and oxygen stress. We modeled the joint dynamics of water column temperature and oxygen to quantify oxythermal habitat for yellow perch (Perca flavescens) in Fish Lake, Wisconsin, USA. To estimate annual oxythermal stress, we developed a novel metric (cumulative oxythermal stress dosage; COSD) that integrates both stress duration and stress magnitude. We find that COSD better predicts observed perch declines than the published TDO3 metric (temperature at depth where dissolved oxygen is 3 mg.L-1), which was developed for cold-water fish. Simulations show increases in COSD between 1911 and 2014, punctuated by a sharp rise since 1989. Extreme COSD years result from the intersection of high maximum daily dosage and prolonged duration exceeding the tolerance threshold. Temperature perturbation experiments to explore future climate scenarios reveal that COSD would increase greatly if the atmosphere warms by >3 degrees C. Applying the COSD metric broadly to temperate lakes could help direct management efforts toward the ecosystems most likely to serve as climate refugia for cold-and cool-water fishes in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available