4.5 Article

Reliability and validity assessment of the revised Symptom Checklist 90 for alopecia areata patients in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 10, Pages 975-980

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.12976

Keywords

alopecia areata; factor analysis; psychological status; reliability; revised Symptom Checklist 90; validity

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271771]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

No study has tested the reliability and validity of the revised Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90-R) for patients with alopecia areata (AA), and few have used it to evaluate the mental health of AA patients. To assess the psychological status in Chinese AA patients using the SCL-90-R, and to evaluate its reliability and validity, the psychological status of 168 patients and 100 controls was evaluated with the Chinese-version SCL-90-R. From this study, we found that The Global Severity Index and nine subscale scores on the SCL-90-R were significantly higher in AA patients than that in the controls. Moreover, The Global Severity Index and nine subscale scores on the SCL-90-R were associated with disease duration, age of onset, sex and type of AA. In addition, the SCL-90-R presented good internal consistency (whole scale =0.98 and split-half coefficient=0.95). The intercorrelations between the nine subscales and their correlations with the total scale were 0.58-0.93. Factor analysis produced 22 factors with eigenvalues more than 1.0; the first factor explained 33.88% of the variance. Only hostility and paranoid ideation merged into one factor. Taken together, our data indicated that Chinese AA patients demonstrate greater psychopathology than healthy controls. The SCL-90-R can be used to assess global psychological distress in AA patients with good reliability and validity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available