4.0 Article

Feasibility, Acceptability and Effects of a Foot Self-Care Educational Intervention on Minor Foot Problems in Adult Patients with Diabetes at Low Risk for Foot Ulceration: A Pilot Study

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 195-201

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.03.020

Keywords

diabetes; educational intervention; foot self-care; foot ulceration; low-risk

Funding

  1. Provincial Nurse Educators Interest Group Research Award
  2. Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
  3. Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The objectives of the pilot study were to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the foot self-care educational intervention, and to explore its preliminary effects on reducing the occurrence of minor foot problems in adult patients with diabetes at low risk for foot ulceration. Methods: A one-group-repeated-measures design was used. The intervention given over 3 weeks consisted of a 1 hour 1-on-1 provider-patient interaction to discuss foot self-care strategies, 1 hour hands-on practice of strategies and 2 10-minute telephone contact booster sessions. Of the 70 eligible consenting participants, 56 completed the study. The outcomes were assessed at pretest and at 3-month follow-up. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used to examine changes in outcomes over time. Results: The findings provided initial evidence suggesting the foot self-care educational intervention is feasible and acceptable to adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It was effective in reducing the occurrence of minor foot skin and toenails problems (all p<0.05) at 3-month follow up. Conclusions: The findings support the effects of the intervention. Future research should evaluate its efficacy using a randomized clinical trial design, and a large sample of patients with diabetes at low risk for foot ulcerations. (C) 2013 Canadian Diabetes Association

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available