4.4 Article

Effects of cropping history and phosphorus source on yield and nitrogen fixation in sole and intercropped cowpea-maize systems

Journal

NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 61-73

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10705-007-9121-7

Keywords

cowpea; maize; intercropping; nitrogen fixation; LER; semi-arid

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Symbiotic N-2-fixation, N uptake efficiency, biomass- and crop production of cowpea and maize as affected by P source, sole- and intercropped, and introduction of break crops were studied on a farmer's fields in semi-arid Tanzania. Cowpea fixed around 60% of its N from the atmosphere amounting to 70 kg N ha(-1) under sole and 36 kg N ha(-1) under intercropping as estimated by the N-15 isotope dilution method around peak biomass production. The amount of N-2-fixed was 30-40% higher when P was applied as either TSP or MRP whereas cowpea yield were unaffected. Intercropped maize with 19,000 plant ha(-1) accumulated the same amount of N as 38,000 sole cropped maize plants although intercropping reduced the dry matter accumulation by 25%. The N uptake efficiency of the applied N-15 labelled fertiliser was 26%, which equal a total pool of early available plant N of 158 kg N ha(-1). Under the N deficient conditions, P application did not increase the grain yield of maize. The LER indicate that sole cropping required 18% more area than intercropping in order to produce the same grain yield, and 35% more land when LER was based on N uptakes. Introduction of break crops in the maize systems, more than doubled accumulation of dry matter and N in the grain compared to continuous maize cropping. During maturation sole crop cowpea shedded leaves containing 41 kg N ha(-1). The current findings underline the importance of crop diversity in Sub Saharan Africa agriculture and emphasise the need for including all residues, including shedded leaves, in nutrient balance studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available