4.3 Review

Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes

Journal

DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 673-716

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954579408000333

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [G0601483, G0100527] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE015260] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH049414, R01MH045070, R29MH049414] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. Medical Research Council [G0100527, G0601483] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE-015260-01A1] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIMH NIH HHS [MH49414, MH45070] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports on the childhood origins and adult outcomes of female versus male antisocial behavior trajectories in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Four antisocial behavior trajectory groups were identified among females and males using general growth mixture modeling and included life-course persistent (LCP), adolescent-onset, childhood-limited, and low trajectory groups. During childhood, both LCP females and males were characterized by social, familial and neurodevelopmental risk factors, whereas those on the adolescent-onset pathway were not. At age 32, women and men on the LCP pathway were engaging in serious violence and experiencing significant mental health, physical health, and economic problems. Females and males on the adolescent-onset pathway were also experiencing difficulties at age 32, although to a lesser extent. Although more males than females followed the LCP trajectory, findings support similarities across gender with respect to developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior and their associated childhood origins and adult consequences. Implications for theory, research, and practice are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available