4.6 Article

Capabilities of several phosphonium ionic liquids for arsenic species determination in water by liquid-liquid microextraction and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 490-499

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay02324b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cienticas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientica y Tecnologica (FONCYT) (PICT-BID)
  3. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo (Argentina)
  4. Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The capabilities of several phosphonium-ionic liquids (PILs) to form ion-pairs with a complex obtained by reaction of arsenate species with molybdate were evaluated. Phosphonium-ILs containing the tetradecyl(trihexyl)phosphonium cation but different anions (dicyanamide and decanoate) and tributyl(methyl)phosphonium methylsulphate IL were studied. The size, polarity and localization of charges in PIL cations were shown to influence their capability to form ion-pairs with the arsenomolybdate (AsMo12O403-) complex and to extract As(V). The performance of PILs was compared with that of a widely used ion-pairing reagent, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). Finally, the IL tetradecyl(trihexyl)phosphonium dicyanamide was chosen to develop a liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) procedure using only 80 mL of tetrachloroethylene as the extractant. The organic phase was directly injected into the graphite furnace of an electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer (ETAAS) for As determination. An extraction efficiency of 100% and a sensitivity enhancement factor of 130 were obtained with 5 mL of sample. The detection limit was 1.9 ng L-1 and the relative standard deviation for six replicate measurements of 1.0 mg L-1 for As was 4.9%, 5.0% and 5.1% for As(V), As(III) and organic As species, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available