4.6 Article

Higher Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio Is Related to Lower Ejection Fraction and Higher Long-term All-Cause Mortality in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 1177-1182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.05.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a novel biomarker that can single out individuals at risk for vascular events. We assessed whether NLR provides additive prognostic value in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: NLR was computed from the absolute values of neutrophils and lymphocytes from the complete blood count of patients who underwent primary coronary angioplasty for STEMI. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to NLR (NLR >= 6.5%, NLR < 6.5%) using chi(2) automatic interaction detection. The association between NLR and in-hospital clinical complications and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) was assessed using logistic regression. The association between NLR, 30-day and 5-year all-cause mortality were analyzed using Cox regression models, adjusting for potential clinical, metabolic, and inflammatory confounders. Results: In a group of 538 consecutive STEMI patients, high NLR (NLR >= 6.5%) was independently associated with increased 30-day and 5-years mortality rates (odds ratio, 15.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-154; P = 0.018; and hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-4.8; P = 0.039, respectively). High NLR was also independently associated with lower EF (49 +/- 8 vs 46 +/- 8; P < 0.001) and fewer hospital complications. Conclusions: In patients presenting with STEMI, high NLR was independently associated with lower EF, fewer hospital complications, and higher mortality rates up to 5 years. NLR value appears additive to conventional risk factors and commonly used biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available