4.0 Article

Meta-analysis of 23 type 2 diabetes linkage studies from the international type 2 diabetes linkage analysis consortium

Journal

HUMAN HEREDITY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages 35-U1

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000114164

Keywords

gene mapping; genetics; GSMA; linkage analysis; meta-analysis; Type 2 diabetes

Funding

  1. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [T37TW000041] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL045522] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [R01HG000376, R29HG000376] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [U01DK062370, U01DK058026, R01DK042273, R01DK047482, R01DK072128, R01DK062370, R01DK054261, R56DK062370] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R37MH059490, R01MH059490] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. FIC NIH HHS [3T37TW00041, T37 TW000041] Funding Source: Medline
  7. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  8. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG000376, HG00376] Funding Source: Medline
  9. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL045522, HL45522] Funding Source: Medline
  10. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK58026, R56 DK062370, DK72128, DK54261, U01 DK062370, R01 DK047482, DK62370, DK42273, R01 DK054261, U01 DK058026, DK54001, R01 DK062370, DK47482, R01 DK072128] Funding Source: Medline
  11. NIMH NIH HHS [MH59490, R37 MH059490, R01 MH059490] Funding Source: Medline
  12. Wellcome Trust [090532] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The International Type 2 Diabetes Linkage Analysis Consortium was formed to localize type 2 diabetes predisposing variants based on 23 autosomal linkage scans. Methods: We carried out meta-analysis using the genome scan meta-analysis (GSMA) method which divides the genome into bins of similar to 30 cM, ranks the best linkage results in each bin for each sample, and then sums the ranks across samples. We repeated the meta-analysis using 2 cM bins, and/or replacing bin ranks with measures of linkage evidence: bin maximum LOD score or bin minimum p value for bins with p value <0.05 (truncated p value). We also carried out computer simulations to assess the empirical type I error rates of these meta-analysis methods. Results: Our analyses provided modest evidence for type 2 diabetes-predisposing variants on chromosomes 4, 10, and 14 (using LOD scores or truncated p values), or chromosome 10 and 16 (using ranks). Our simulation results suggested that uneven marker density across studies results in substantial variation in empirical type I error rates for all meta-analysis methods, but that 2 cM bins and scores that make more explicit use of linkage evidence, especially the truncated p values, reduce this problem. Conclusion: We identified regions modestly linked with type 2 diabetes by summarizing results from 23 autosomal genome scans. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available