4.7 Article

Evaluation of on-farm tools for colostrum quality measurement

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages 1878-1884

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2014-8415

Keywords

colostrum; radial immunodiffusion; colostrometer; Brix refractometer; immunoglobulin G

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to determine the immunoglobulin G (IgG) content of colostrum on Alberta dairy farms and to determine which on-farm tool, the colostrometer or the Brix refractometer, was more highly correlated with IgG content as determined by radial immunodiffusion (RID). Colostrum samples (n = 569) were collected between February and July 2012 from 13 commercial dairy farms in central Alberta, with herds ranging in size from 60 to 300 lactating cows. Immunoglobulin G content was determined directly by RID and indirectly by a colostrometer (specific gravity) and Brix refractometer (total solids). The Spearman correlation was used for the colostrometer and Brix refractometer data. According to RID analysis, 29.1% of the colostrum samples contained <50 mg/mL IgG. Concentrations ranged from 8.3 to 128.6 mg/mL IgG, with a median of 65.1 mg/mL. Third or greater parity cows had higher colostral IgG content (69.5 +/- 1.98 mg/mL) than second parity (59.80 +/- 2.06 mg/mL) or first parity (62.2 +/- 1.73 mg/mL) cows. The colostrometer data were more highly correlated with RID results (r = 0.77) than were the Brix refractometer data (r = 0.64). Specificity and sensitivity were determined for the colostrometer and Brix refractometer compared with a cut-point of 50 mg/mL IgG as determined by RID. The highest combined value for sensitivity and specificity occurred at 80 mg/mL for the colostrometer (84.1 and 77.0%, respectively) and 23% Brix (65.7 and 82.8%, respectively). This study indicates that although the colostrometer data are better correlated with true IgG values, the user-friendly Brix refractometer is a more specific tool to detect colostrum of adequate quality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available