4.6 Article

Cardiac risk assessment before the use of stimulant medications in children and youth: A joint position statement by the Canadian Paediatric Society, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages 625-630

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0828-282X(09)70157-6

Keywords

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; Consensus statement; Pediatric; Population health; Risk; Sudden death

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulatory decisions and scientific statements regarding the management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) raise questions about the safety of medications and the appropriate pretreatment evaluation to determine suitability for treatment with medication. This is particularly true in the setting of known structural or functional heart disease. The present paper reviews the available data, including peer-reviewed literature, data from the United States Food and Drug, Administration Web site oil reported adverse reactions in children using Stimulant medication, and Health Canada data on the same problem. A consensus-based guideline oil appropriate assessment is provided, based on input from members of the Canadian Paediatric Society, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, with specific expertise and knowledge in the areas of both ADHD and pediatric cardiology. The present statement advocates a thorough history and physical examination before starting stimulant medications, with an emphasis on the identification of risk factors for Sudden death, but does not routinely recommend electrocardiographic screening or cardiac subspecialist consultation unless indicated by history or physical examination findings. A checklist for identifying children who are potentially at risk Of Sudden death (independent of ADHD or medications used to treat it) is provided. Although recommendations are based on the best evidence Currently available, the committee further agrees that more research on this Subject is necessary to optimize the approach to this common clinical scenario.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available