4.3 Article

An integrated multidisciplinary approach to implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12630-009-9159-x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Departments of Anaesthesia and Surgery
  2. McGill University Health Centre

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Enhanced perioperative care programs have been developed in order to attenuate the impact of surgical stress on organ dysfunction, thereby accelerating hospital discharge and reducing morbidity. The implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery is reported. Methods We report on a series of patients who entered a coordinated program based on preoperative patient education and counseling, a laparoscopic approach, provision of postoperative epidural analgesia, early food intake and mobilization, and structured surgical and nursing care practices. The program was introduced in September 2006 and adapted to our institutional needs. Outcome measures included length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, incidences of postoperative complications, and rate of readmission to hospital. Results Twenty-five patients were selected by the surgeons for the accelerated laparoscopic colorectal pathway. The median duration of hospital stay was 3 (95% confidence interval, 3-4) days. Sixteen patients (64%) were discharged from hospital on day 3. Nine patients failed the pathway for various reasons (social indications, poor pain relief, wound infection, anemia, urinary retention) and were discharged later (six patients on day 4, two patients on day 5, and one patient on day 6). Times to recover bowel function and to resume a full diet were all within the first 36 hr from time of surgery. There were two readmissions. Conclusion This early clinical experience demonstrates the feasibility of a fast-track program for colonic surgery and the requirement for an integrated multidisciplinary approach to perioperative care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available