3.8 Article

Performance analysis of a new sustainable evaporative cooling pad made from coconut coir

Journal

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19397030802326726

Keywords

sustainable engineering; agriculture waste; absorbent pad; heat and mass transfer; evaporative cooling pads

Funding

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF)
  2. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  3. Commission on Higher Education (CHE) of the Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports a performance analysis for a new sustainable engineering application to beneficially reuse an abundant agricultural waste, coconut coir (Cocos nucifera), in evaporative cooling pads. Two small coconut coir pads of different configurations were fabricated and tested using a laboratory-scale experimental arrangement. The air supply velocity was controlled and varied between 1.88 and 2.79m s(-1). Heat and mass transfer coefficients, evaporative cooling efficiency and pressure drop across the two types of coconut coir pad were analysed and compared with those of a commercial rigid media paper pad. Results show that the cooling efficiency of the manufactured coconut coir evaporative cooling pad was fairly good (about 50%) and close to that of the commercial paper pad (about 47%). The average pressure drop across the two coconut coir pads was 1.5 and 5.1 Pa respectively. Correlations for heat and mass transfer coefficients expressed using Nusselt and Sherwood numbers are also reported. In addition, the cooling potential of the coconut coir pads was analysed using the average climatic conditions of the central region in Thailand throughout the year. The analysis showed that the air temperature leaving the coconut coir pad varied from 23 to 28 degrees C. Commercial development appears feasible given the coconut coir pad's good performance, lower cost and its availability throughout the country.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available