4.7 Article

Central nervous system involvement in mantle cell lymphoma

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 135-141

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm447

Keywords

central nervous system involvement; mantle cell lymphoma; prognosis; risk factors

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Extranodal involvement including central nervous system (CNS), is a frequent event in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, the incidence, risk factors, and impact on outcome remain controversial. Patients and methods: Main clinical, biological, and evolutive features of 82 patients (60 males/22 females; median age: 61 years) diagnosed with MCL (blastoid, 26%) in a single institution were analyzed for risk of CNS involvement and prognosis. Results: Most patients had advanced stage and intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index (IPI). Eleven patients eventually developed CNS involvement with an actuarial 5-year risk of 26% (95% confidence interval 10% to 42%). In one asymptomatic patient, cerebrospinal fluid infiltration was detected at staging maneuvers (1/62; 1.6%). The remaining 10 patients developed neurological symptoms during the course of the disease (median time from diagnosis, 25 months). Initial variables predicting CNS involvement were blastoid histology, high proliferative index measured by Ki-67 staining, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and intermediate- or high-risk IPI. Histological subtype and serum LDH maintained significance in multivariate analysis. Treatment of CNS infiltration consisted of intrathecal chemotherapy (two cases), and intrathecal chemotherapy plus systemic treatment (seven cases). Median survival after CNS involvement was 4.8 months, patients with this complication having shorter survival than those with no CNS disease. Conclusion: This study confirms the high incidence of CNS involvement in MCL patients. Treatments aimed at preventing this complication are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available