4.8 Article

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta protects against chemically induced liver toxicity in mice

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 225-235

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.21925

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA124533, CA89607, CA97999] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA089607, ZIABC005708, R01CA124533, R01CA097999] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potential functional roles for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta (PPAR beta/delta) in skeletal muscle fatty acid catabolism and epithelial carcinogenesis have recently been described. Whereas PPAR beta/delta is expressed in liver, its function in this tissue is less clear. To determine the role of PPAR beta/delta in chemically induced liver toxicity, wild-type and PPAR beta/delta-null mice were treated with azoxymethane (AOM) and markers of liver toxicity examined. Bile duct hyperplasia, regenerative hyperplasia, and increased serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were found in AOM-treated PPAR beta/delta-null mice, and these effects were not observed in similarly treated wild-type mice. Exacerbated carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) hepatoxicity was also observed in PPAR beta/delta-null as compared with wild-type mice. No differences in messenger RNAs (mRNAs) encoding cytochrome2E1 required for the metabolic activation of AOM and CCl4 were observed between wild-type or PPAR beta/delta-null mice in response to CCl4. Significant differences in the expression of genes reflecting enhanced nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) activity were noted in PPAR beta/delta-nall mice. Conclusion: Results from these studies show that PPAR beta/delta is protective against liver toxicity induced by AOM and CCl4, suggesting that this receptor is hepatoprotective against environmental chemicals that are metabolized in this tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available