4.4 Article

Effects of Different Dosages of Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein 1-34 on the Bone Metabolism of the Ovariectomized Rat Model of Osteoporosis

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 93, Issue 3, Pages 276-287

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-013-9755-1

Keywords

Osteoporosis; Ovariectomized rat; Parathyroid hormone-related protein 1-34; Bone mineral density; Bone histomorphometry; Bone biomechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intermittent and low-dose parathyroid hormone (PTH) injection to stimulate bone formation has been used in the treatment of osteoporosis. The N-terminal fragment 1-34 of PTH is quite similar in structure and function to N-terminal PTH-related protein (PTHrP). PTH(1-34) and PTHrP also share a coreceptor, the PTH/PTHrP receptor. Therefore, some studies have suggested that PTHrP could effectively stimulate bone formation, similar to PTH. We used an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of osteoporosis to study the effects of PTHrP(1-34) on bone metabolism by measuring bone mineral density (BMD), bone histomorphometrics, and biomechanical parameters. We found that subcutaneous injection of PTHrP(1-34) (40 or 80 mu g/kg body weight every day) in OVX rats increased lumbar and femoral BMD, improved bone biomechanical properties, enhanced bone strength, and promoted bone formation. We selected 40 mu g/kg as the preferred therapeutic dose of PTHrP(1-34) and investigated the effects of frequency of treatment (per 1, 2, 3, or 7 days) on bone metabolism in OVX rats. We found that injection of PTHrP(1-34) once per day or every other day significantly improved the BMD and strength of OVX rats. Serum calcium and phosphate levels in all treated rats did not vary significantly from control rats. Based on our results, intermittent low-dose PTHrP(1-34) injection promoted bone formation in OVX rats, suggesting a high potential for therapeutic use in osteoporosis patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available