4.7 Article

Diffuse interstellar bands in z < 0.6 Ca II absorbers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 383, Issue 1, Pages L30-L34

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00404.x

Keywords

line : identification; ISM : abundances; dust, extinction; ISM : lines and bands; ISM : molecules; quasars : absorption lines

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D001684/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/D001684/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) probably arise from complex organic molecules whose strength in local galaxies correlates with neutral hydrogen column density, N(HI), and dust reddening, E(B - V). Because Ca II absorbers in quasar (QSO) spectra are posited to have high N(HI) and significant E(B - V), they represent promising sites for the detection of DIBs at cosmological distances. Here we present the results from the first search for DIBs in nine Ca II-selected absorbers at 0.07 < z(abs) < 0.55. We detect the 5780-angstrom DIB in one line of sight at z(abs) = 0.1556; this is only the second QSO absorber in which a DIB has been detected. Unlike the majority of local DIB sight-lines, both QSO absorbers with detected DIBs show weak 6284-angstrom absorption compared with the 5780-angstrom band. This may be indicative of different physical conditions in intermediate redshift QSO absorbers compared with local galaxies. Assuming that local relations between the 5780-angstrom DIB strength and N(HI) and E(B - V) apply in QSO absorbers, DIB detections and limits can be used to derive N(HI) and E(B - V). For the one absorber in this study with a detected DIB, we derive E(B - V) = 0.23 mag and log N(HI) >= 20.9, consistent with previous conclusions that Ca II systems have high HI column densities and significant reddening. For the remaining eight Ca II-selected absorbers with 5780-angstrom DIB non-detections, we derive E(B - V) upper limits of 0.1-0.3 mag.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available