4.6 Article

The most massive stars in the Arches cluster

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 478, Issue 1, Pages 219-U63

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078469

Keywords

stars : early-type; stars : Wolf-Rayet; stars : atmospheres; stars : winds, outflows; Galaxy : center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. We study a sample composed of 28 of the brightest stars in the Arches cluster. Our aim is to constrain their stellar and wind properties and to establish their nature and evolutionary status. Methods. We analyze K-band spectra obtained with the integral field spectrograph SINFONI on the VLT. Atmosphere models computed with the code CMFGEN are used to derive the effective temperatures, luminosities, stellar abundances, mass loss rates and wind terminal velocities. Results. We find that the stars in our sample are either H-rich WN7-9 stars (WN7-9h) or supergiants, where two are classified as OIf(+). All stars are 2-4 Myr old. There is marginal evidence for a younger age among the most massive stars. The WN7-9h stars reach luminosities as high as 2 x 10(6) L-circle dot, consistent with initial masses of similar to 120 M-circle dot. They are still quite H-rich, but show both N enhancement and C depletion. They are thus identified as core H-burning objects showing products of the CNO equilibrium on their surface. Their progenitors are most likely supergiants of spectral types earlier than O4-6 and initial masses >60 M-circle dot. Their winds follow a well-defined modified wind momentum - luminosity relation (WLR): this is a strong indication that they are radiatively driven. Stellar abundances tend to favor a slightly super-solar metallicity, at least for the lightest metals. We note, however, that the evolutionary models seem to under-predict the degree of N enrichment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available