4.4 Article

Virtual reality for acute pain reduction in adolescents undergoing burn wound care: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Journal

BURNS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 650-657

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.11.010

Keywords

Pain; Distraction; Virtual reality; Adolescent; Pediatric; Burns

Funding

  1. Diversionary Therapy Technologies (DTT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Effective pain management remains a challenge for adolescents during conscious burn wound care procedures. Virtual reality (VR) shows promise as a non-pharmacological adjunct in reducing pain. Aims: This study assessed off-the-shelf VR for (1) its effect on reducing acute pain intensity during adolescent burn wound care, and (2) its clinical utility in a busy hospital setting. Methods: Forty-one adolescents (11-17 years) participated in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Acute pain outcomes including adolescent self-report, nursing staff behavioral observation, caregiver observation and physiological measures were collected. Length of procedure times and adolescent reactions were also recorded to inform clinical utility. Results: Nursing staff reported a statistically significant reduction in pain scores during dressing removal, and significantly less rescue doses of Entonox given to those receiving VR, compared to those receiving standard distraction. For all other pain outcomes and length of treatment, there was a trend for lower pain scores and treatment times for those receiving VR, but these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Despite only minimal pain reduction achieved using off-the-shelf VR, other results from this trial and previous research on younger children with burns suggest a customized, adolescent and hospital friendly device may be more effective in pain reduction. (c) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd and ISBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available