4.4 Article

Compliance with nutrition support guidelines in acutely burned patients

Journal

BURNS
Volume 38, Issue 5, Pages 645-649

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.002

Keywords

Nutrition; Critical illness; Burns

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Adequate and timely provision of nutritional support is a crucial component of care of the critically ill burn patient. The goal of this study was to assess a single center's consistency with Society of Critical Care Medicine/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SCCM/ASPEN) guidelines for nutritional support in critically ill patients. Methods: Acutely burned patients >45 kg in weight admitted to a regional burn center during a two-year period and who required 5 or more days of full enteral nutritional support were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective review. Specific outcomes evaluated include time from admission to feeding tube placement and enteral feeding initiation and percent of nutritional goal received within the first week of hospital stay. Descriptive statistics were used for all analyses. IRB approval was obtained. Results: Thirty-seven patients were included in this retrospective review. Median age of patients was 44.9 years (IQR: 24.2-55.1), and median burn injury size was 30% (IQR: 19-47). Median time to feeding tube placement was 31.1 h post admission (IQR: 23.6-50.2 h), while median time to initiation of EN was 47.9 h post admission (IQR: 32.4-59.9 h). The median time required for patients to reach 60% of caloric goal was 3 days post-admission (IQR: 3-4.5). Conclusion: The median time for initiation of enteral nutrition was within the SCCM/ASPEN guidelines for initial nutrition in the critically ill patient. This project identified a 16 h time lag between placement of enteral access and initiation of enteral nutrition. Development of a protocol for feeding tube placement and enteral nutrition management may optimize early nutritional support in the acutely injured burn patient. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available