4.1 Article

Diagnostic utility of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine immunohistochemistry in melanocytic proliferations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS PATHOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 11, Pages 807-814

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cup.12564

Keywords

5-hydroxymethylcytosine; epigenetics; melanoma; nevus; dermatopathology

Funding

  1. Resident Research Fund grant from the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins Hospital
  2. Fred and Janet Sanfilippo Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Decreased hydroxymethylated cytosine (5-hydroxymethycytosine, 5-hmC) is reported to correlate with melanocyte dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic utility of this observation. 5-hmC immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays containing 171-melanocytic lesions from two different institutions. An immunohistochemical staining score representing the percentage and intensity of nuclear staining was assigned. The performance characteristics of 5-hmC immunohistochemistry for discriminating between a nevus and melanoma were determined. Additional cases of melanoma arising in a nevus (n = 8), nodal nevi (n = 5) and melanoma micrometastases to a lymph node (n = 6) were also assessed. Pronounced 5-hmC loss was observed in melanomas when compared with nevi (mean +/- standard deviation = 6.71 +/- 11.78 and 55.19 +/- 23.66, respectively, p < 0.0001). While the mean immunohistochemical staining score values for melanocytic nevi and melanoma were distinct, there was considerable variability in immunohistochemical staining score within a single diagnostic category. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay for nevus vs. melanoma is 92.74 and 97.78%, respectively. Distinct biphasic staining patterns were observed in cases of melanoma arising in association with a nevus. Relative changes of 5-hmC expression within a single lesion may be more informative than absolute values when using 5-hmC as a diagnostic adjunct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available