4.4 Article

An in vitro biofilm model to examine the effect of antibiotic ointments on biofilms produced by burn wound bacterial isolates

Journal

BURNS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 312-321

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.09.017

Keywords

Biofilm; Topical antimicrobials; Burn infection; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus

Funding

  1. NIH [AI078921]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Topical treatment of burn wounds is essential as reduced blood supply in the burned tissues restricts the effect of systemic antibiotics. On the burn surface, microorganisms exist within a complex structure termed a biofilm, which enhances bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents significantly. Since bacteria differ in their ability to develop biofilms, the susceptibility of these biofilms to topically applied antibiotics varies, making it essential to identify which topical antibiotics efficiently disrupt or prevent biofilms produced by these pathogens. Yet, a simple in vitro assay to compare the susceptibility of biofilms produced by burn wound isolates to different topical antibiotics has not been reported. Methods: Biofilms were developed by inoculating cellulose disks on agar plates with burn wound isolates and incubating for 24 h. The biofilms were then covered for 24 h with untreated gauze or gauze coated with antibiotic ointment and remaining microorganisms were quantified and visualized microscopically. Results: Mupirocin and triple antibiotic ointments significantly reduced biofilms produced by the Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound isolates tested, as did gentamicin ointment, with the exception of one P. aeruginosa clinical isolate. Conclusions: The described assay is a practical and reproducible approach to identify topical antibiotics most effective in eliminating biofilms produced by burn wound isolates. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available