Journal
BURNS
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 288-293Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.08.009
Keywords
End of life; DNAR; Do-Not-Resuscitate; Burn death; Palliation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Introduction: Despite advancements in the provision of burn care, there is still a significant cohort of patients who fail to respond to therapy or for whom treatment is deemed futile. The decision to withdraw support from, or to implement a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNAR) order in, such patients can be challenging. Our aims were to review the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, issuing of DNAR orders and end of life care in burn patient deaths. Methods: A retrospective case notes review was undertaken, for all burn in-patient deaths from 1st April 2001 to 31st December 2007. Results: Following exclusions, 63 patients were included in our study, with a median age of 56 years (21-94). End of life decisions in younger patients (under 65 years) were more often due to burn severity. In those over 65 years, reasons were due to co-morbidities, and these decisions were made late in the patient's admission. In 34% of patients, end of life care was not comprehensively documented. Conclusion: A coherent, decisive approach should be adopted and adhered to by all members of the multi-disciplinary team, with clear, standardised documentation in place. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available