4.5 Article

Stillbirth in rural Bangladesh: arsenic exposure and other etiological factors: a report from Gonoshasthaya Kendra

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages 172-177

Publisher

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.07.043083

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To use data collected by Gonoshasthaya Kendra, a large nongovernmental organization providing health care to some 600 villages, to describe the epidemiological pattern of stillbirth and any additional contribution made by arsenic contamination of hand-pump wells in Bangladesh. Methods Completed pregnancies and outcomes (n = 30 984) for two calendar years, together with existing data on 26 socioeconomic and health factors were selected for study. The health care in these villages was administered from 16 geographical centres; information on the average arsenic concentration in each centre was obtained from the National Hydrochemical Survey. After univariate analysis, a multivariate, multilevel, logistic model for stillbirth was developed. The additional effect of arsenic was calculated having adjusted for all potential confounders thus identified. Findings The overall stillbirth rate was 3.4% (1056/30 984) and increased with estimated arsenic concentration (2.96% at < 10 mu g/l; 3.79% at 10 mu g/l to < 50 mu g/l; 4.43% at >= 50 mu g/l). Having adjusted for 17 socioeconomic and health factors, the odds ratios estimated for arsenic (with < 10 mu g/l as reference) remained raised: 1.23 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.87-1.74) at 10 mu g/l to < 50 mu g/l and 1.80 (95% CI: 1.14-2.86) at 50 mu g/l or greater. Conclusion An increased risk of stillbirth is associated with arsenic contamination. This risk, substantial enough to be detected by an ecological approach and not readily attributable to unmeasured confounding, is essentially preventable and all efforts must be made to protect women at high risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available