4.4 Article

Mixture Models for Improved Earthquake Forecasting with Short-to-Medium Time Horizons

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages 2203-2215

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120120233

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation through the New Zealand Natural Hazards Research Platform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimal mixtures of three space-time-magnitude earthquake likelihood models are found for forecasting earthquakes with magnitudes of 5.0 and greater in the New Zealand and California catalogs, with forecasting time horizons ranging from 0 to 3000 days. The models are the Epidemic-Type Aftershock (ETAS) short-term clustering model, the Every Earthquake a Precursor According to Scale (EEPAS) medium-term clustering model, and the Proximity to Past Earthquakes (PPE) quasitime-invariant smoothed seismicity model. The ETAS model is by far the most informative of these models for short time horizons of a few days, but even with a zero time horizon, an optimal mixture of the three models, here called the Janus model, outperforms it with an information gain per earthquake (IGPE) of about 0.1. For time horizons of 10-3000 days, the Janus model outperforms the most informative of its component models with IGPEs ranging from 0.2 to 0.5. As the time horizon lengthens beyond six months in New Zealand and two years in California, the EEPAS model becomes the most informative of the individual models and the major component of the optimal mixture. Changes in the Janus model parameters with the forecasting time horizon reveal features of time- and-area scaling of precursory seismicity. The results suggest that both cascades of triggering and the precursory scale increase phenomenon contribute to earthquake predictability and that these contributions are largely independent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available