4.4 Article

Watching the Wind: Seismic Data Contamination at Long Periods due to Atmospheric Pressure-Field-Induced Tilting

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages 1255-1265

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120110186

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Following the installation of a new broadband seismic station near the Pacific coast of the Olympic Peninsula, Washington, the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network recorded elevated background seismic noise at periods exceeding 30 s. We observed power spectral density variations of about 15-20 dB in the horizontal-component seismograms between times of high and low noise, and differences of up to about 25 dB between the horizontal and vertical components during noisy intervals. The amplitude of the signal at long periods exhibited clear correlations with cyclic daytime fluctuations of air temperature and wind speed. Our observations provided measurable evidence that the variations of the local atmospheric pressure field associated with local wind systems represents an effective source of ground displacements and rotations. The rotational component of the pressure-field-induced motion is recorded by horizontal-component seismometers that, below their low-frequency corner, are sensitive to surface tilts. The response of seismometers to ground rotations is characterized by a transfer function, which we use to estimate the amplitude of tilt. We measured a pressure-field-induced surface tilt of the order of several tenths of mu rad. Based on simple modeling, tilt contamination is expected to attenuate rapidly with depth and to become negligible just a few hundreds of meters below the surface. Removal of this unwanted effect from seismograms remains a challenging task as the details of tilting depend on the nonstationary character of the pressure field, the compliance of the near surface to pressure variations, and the design and construction of the seismic station.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available