4.6 Review

Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000452.pub2

Keywords

*adaptation psychological; *bereavement counseling; *death family; fetal death; infant; newborn; *life change events; *social support

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Provision of an empathetic caring environment, and strategies to enable the mother, father and family to accept the reality of perinatal death, are now an accepted part of standard nursing and social support in most of the developed world. Provision of interventions such as psychological support or counselling, or both, has been suggested to improve outcomes for families after a perinatal death. Objectives The objective of this review was to assess the effects of the provision of any form of medical, nursing, social or psychological support or counselling, or both, to mother, father and families after perinatal death. Search strategy We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 October 2007) and reference lists of articles. Selection criteria Randomised trials of any form of general support aimed at encouraging acceptance of loss, specific bereavement counselling, or specialised psychological support/counselling including psychotherapy for mother, father and families experiencing perinatal death. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently assessed eligibility of trials; a third person subsequently assessed the quality of the identified trials as a part of this review update. Main results No trials were included. Authors' conclusions There is currently insufficient information available from randomised trials to indicate whether there is or is not a benefit from interventions which aim to provide psychological support or counselling for mothers, fathers or families after perinatal death. Methodologically rigorous trials are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available