4.7 Article

Modeling cosmogenic radionuclides Be-10 and Be-7 during the Maunder Minimum using the ECHAM5-HAM General Circulation Model

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 2797-2809

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-8-2797-2008

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All existing Be-10 records from Greenland and Antarctica show increasing concentrations during the Maunder Minimum period (MM), 1645-1715, when solar activity was very low and the climate was colder (little ice age). In detail, however, the Be-10 records deviate from each other. We investigate to what extent climatic changes influence the Be-10 measured in ice by modeling this period using the ECHAM5-HAM general circulation model. Production calculations show that during the MM the mean global Be-10 production was higher by 32% than at present due to lower solar activity. Our modeling shows that the zonally averaged modeled 10Be deposition flux deviates by only similar to 8% from the average increase of 32%, indicating that climatic effects are much smaller than the production change. Due to increased stratospheric production, the Be-10 content in the downward fluxes is larger during MM, leading to larger Be-10 deposition fluxes in the subtropics, where stratosphere-troposphere exchange (STE) is strongest. In polar regions the effect is small. In Greenland the deposition change depends on latitude and altitude. In Antarctica the change is larger in the east than in the west. We use the Be-10/Be-7 ratio to study changes in STE. We find larger change between 20 degrees N-40 degrees N during spring, pointing to a stronger STE in the Northern Hemisphere during MM. In the Southern Hemisphere the change is small. These findings indicate that climate changes do influence the Be-10 deposition fluxes, but not enough to significantly disturb the production signal. Climate-induced changes remain small, especially in polar regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available