4.6 Article

Factor XIa and tissue factor activity in patients with coronary artery disease

Journal

THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 142-149

Publisher

SCHATTAUER GMBH-VERLAG MEDIZIN NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN
DOI: 10.1160/TH07-08-0499

Keywords

coronary artery disease; factor XIa; tissue factor; inflammation markers; coagulation markers

Funding

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [P01HL046703] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL46703] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It has been established that inflammation and enhanced procoagulant activity are associated with the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic vascular disease. We evaluated and compared the contributions of the factor (F)XIa and tissue factor (TF) activity in plasma of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Citrate plasma was obtained prior to therapy from 53 patients with stable angina (29 with a history of previous myocardial infarction; CAD-MI) and 30 with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within 12 hours from pain onset. Four ACS patients treated with heparin were excluded. FXIa and TF activity were determined in clotting assays based upon the prolongation of clotting time by inhibitory monoclonal antibodies. Twenty-five of 26 ACS patients (96%) and 22 of 29 CAD-MI patients (76%) had quantifiable FXIa (50 +/- 33 and 42 +/- 45pM, respectively). Ten of 26 (38%) ACS patients and only three of 53 (6%) stable CAD patients showed TF activity (<0.4pM). No FXIa or TF activity was observed in age-matched healthy controls (n=12). For both CAD-MI and ACS patients,there were correlations (p<0.05) between FXIa and interleukin-6 (R-2=0.59 and 0.39, respectively) and between FXIa and TAT (R-2=0.64 and 0.63, respectively). In conclusion, the majority of ACS and CAD-MI patients have circulating FXIa that correlates with markers of coagulation and inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available