4.4 Article

The effects of fish oil and high or low linoleic acid intake on fatty acid composition of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 147-154

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507791900

Keywords

PUFA; fish oil; incorporation; mononuclear cell; linoleic acid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dietary intake of 18: 2n-6 and 18: 3n-3 may affect endogenous production and incorporation of n-3 long-chain PUFA (LCPUFA) from fish oils (170). This double-blinded controlled 2 x 2-factorial 8-week intervention investigates the effects of high and low 18: 2n-6 intake in combination with FO-supplementation on tissue fatty acid composition. Healthy young men (it 64) were randomized to capsules with FO or olive oil (control) (4-4 (2-0-5-6) ml/d) and to either sunflower oil and margarine (S/B) or rapeseed oil and a butter spread (R/K) to provide a high or a low 18: 2n-6 intake. Diet was measured by 4-d weighed dietary records at baseline, during and 8 weeks after the intervention and tissue incorporation as fatty acid composition of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). The fat intervention gave a mean difference in the 18: 2n-6 intake of 7.3 g/d (95 % CI 4-6, 10-0) and a similar 18: 3n-3 intake in the groups. The R/K groups had a 0.2 % fatty acid (FA%) (95 % CI 0.0, 0.4, P=0.02) higher content of 22: 5n-3 in the PBMC, a tendency of slightly higher 20: 5n-3 (P=0.06), but no more 22: 6n-3 (P=0.83) than the SIB groups. FO effectively raised the PBMC content of all n-3 LCPUFA (P<0.001). The fat intervention did not markedly influence the effect of 170; the mean PBMC content of n-3 LCPUFA was 10.3 (SEM 0.3) FA% in the FO + SIB group and 10.6 (SEM 0.2) FA% in the FO + R/K group. In conclusion, increasing the 18: 2n-6 intake did not have any pronounced effect on incorporation of n-3 LCPUFA in PBMC, either alone or with simultaneous FO supplementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available